User talk:Shan.diss
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Shan.diss, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Intare con, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Intare con
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Intare con, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
- To be clear, your account User:Intare con was blocked for inappropriate editing. That does not mean "create a new account and carry right on", it means that you may not edit under any account or anonymously until you have successfully requested an unblock. We do not permit promotional material. Additionally, please note our disclosure policy for editors who are paid or compensated to edit, including being asked or expected to do so as a duty of employment. If any of the above applies to you, those disclosures are mandatory. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Shan.diss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i will not violate rules Shan.diss (talk) 07:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The trouble with accepting unblock requests such as "i will not violate rules" is that experience over the years shows that editors who post unblock requests as vague as that usually don't actually understand the reason for the block, and therefore continue to edit in the same way as before. The block notice on the talk page of your earlier account tells you that in an unblock request you need to "Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked" and "Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked": you have done neither of those. Also, did you take the advice given on both talk pages to read the guide to appealing blocks before requesting an unblock? If you did, you should have realised that this request was unlikely to be accepted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.